К содержимому
learnspaceYOUR NEXT CHAPTER
ПРОСТРАНСТВО ОБУЧЕНИЯ
ГлавнаяКаталог курсовМоё обучениеCoursera

Знания без границ

Учитесь у лучших университетов и компаний мира.

Открыть Coursera
Интеграция
Пространство университета
Моё пространствоСтраница курса
↵
ЯЛичный кабинетСтудент
© 2026 LearnSpaceКаждый день — возможность узнать больше.Помощь
Challenging Forensic Science: How Science Should Speak to Court · LearnSpace
Назад в каталог
courseraОбщество

Challenging Forensic Science: How Science Should Speak to Court

Курс от University of Lausanne
Начальный≈ 16.9 чАнглийский
О курсеНавыкиПрограммаПреподаватели

О курсе

The aim of this course is to promote critical thinking with regard to forensic science. Today, in general, most people are dazzled by the technical possibilities offered by forensic science. They somewhat live in the illusion that forensic evidence is fool proof and brings factual findings with 100% certainty. This course – given by specialists in the field – goes beyond the conventional image that is promoted through TV series such as CSI. It alerts (without alarming) the public on the limits of the techniques in order to promote a sound administration of forensic science in the criminal justice system.  It allows participants to understand the importance of probabilistic reasoning in forensic science, because uncertainty is a constitutive part of forensic science. The course is constructed as a series of causes célèbres that could or have led to miscarriages of justice. Some of these cases have been part of case reviews carried out at the School of Criminal Justice of the University of Lausanne. ****************** Special thanks to our translators, in particular the University of Lausanne and the School of Criminal Justice sincerely thank Massimiliano Stabile (forensic biologist), Francesco Zampa (forensic chemist) and Giampietro Lago (forensic biologist) for the Italian translation of the course.

Навыки, которые вы освоите

Criminal Investigation and ForensicsProbability & StatisticsStatistical ReportingCase StudiesCourt SystemsMolecular BiologyLegal ProceedingsInvestigationLaboratory ReportsScientific MethodsVerification And ValidationStatistical AnalysisTechnical CommunicationResearch

Программа курса

5 модулей · 68 учебных материалов

01Week 1 - What is the "DNA" of a good forensic report ?20 материалов

About us

Course Introduction: Meet your Lausanne TeamВидеоPresentation and visit of The School of Criminal JusticeВидеоInstructorsЧтениеDevelopment TeamЧтение

Учитесь у экспертов

Alex Biedermann

Associate Professor

Franco Taroni

Full Professor

Christophe Champod

Full Professor

Tacha Hicks

Scientist

Challenging Forensic Science: How Science Should Speak to Court
В каталоге вашей программы

Инвестируйте в себя

Новые знания — в удобное для вас время.

Начать на Coursera

Обучение откроется на Coursera
в новой вкладке

Обучение на Coursera

≈ 16.9 ч

5 модулей

Язык: Английский

Субтитры: Арабский, Французский, Украинский, Китайский (Китай), Греческий, Итальянский, Бразильский португальский, Нидерландский, Корейский, Немецкий, Русский, Тайский, Индонезийский, Шведский, Турецкий, Испанский, Хинди, Японский, Казахский, Польский

Часть программы вашего университета
Guests interviewedЧтение

Course guidelines

Course learning objectivesВидеоSyllabus and Grading policiesЧтениеDiscussion forum guidelinesЧтениеGetting started: Break the ice !Чтение

Week 1

Week 1 Introduction: What is the “DNA” of a Good Forensic Report?ВидеоForensic Science and Evaluative ReportingВидеоUncertainty in the Criminal TrialВидеоPrinciples of forensic reporting (Part A): 1st PrincipleВидеоPrinciples of forensic reporting (Part B): 2nd and 3rd PrinciplesВидеоENFSI Guideline for Evaluative ReportingВидеоConclusion of week 1: What is the “DNA” of a Good Forensic Report?ВидеоAdditional literature Week 1Чтение

Interviews

Interview with Prof. Colin AitkenВидеоInterview with Dr. Sc. Sheila WillisВидео

Quiz

Week 1Задание
02Week 2 - Elementary: source is not activity !10 материалов

Week 2

Week 2 Introduction - Elementary: Source is not Activity! !ВидеоPart A - DNA recovered on a suspect (1): Hierarchy of PropositionsВидеоPart A - DNA recovered on a suspect (2): the Weller CaseВидеоPart B - Gunshot residues recovered on a suspect: The George caseВидеоPart C - DNA recovered on a victim (1): the Butler and Nealon casesВидеоPart C - DNA recovered on a victim (2): Checklist for auditing statementsВидеоWeek 2 Conclusion - Elementary: Source is not Activity !ВидеоAdditional literature Week 2Чтение

Interviews

Interview with Dr. Sc. CBE Ian Evett and Prof. Graham JacksonВидео

Quiz

Week 2Задание
03Week 3 - DNA is not the magic bullet14 материалов

Week 3

Week 3 Introduction: DNA is not the Magic BulletВидеоDNA in the lab (1): From Detection to QuantificationВидеоDNA in the lab (2): From Amplification to DNA ProfileВидеоPart A - The Knox and Sollecito case (1) Summary of the circumstancesВидеоPart A - The Knox and Sollecito case (2) Low Template DNAВидеоPart A - The Knox and Sollecito case (3) Discussion and ConclusionВидеоPart B - Transfer and pollution (1) the Jama caseВидеоPart B - Transfer and pollution: The Probability of Error/PollutionВидеоPart C - Transfer and pollution: the Anderson and Scott casesВидеоWeek 3 Conclusion: DNA is not the Magic BulletВидеоAdditional literature Week 3Чтение

Interviews

Interview with Prof. Peter GillВидеоInterview with Prof. Pierre MargotВидео

Quiz

Week 3Задание
04Week 4 - Trials by Numbers or Numbers on Trial10 материалов

Week 4

Week 4 Introduction: Trials by Numbers or Numbers on Trial ?ВидеоPart A - Statistics in Court (1): the Clark and Collins CasesВидеоPart A - Statistics in Court (2): the Clark and Collins CasesВидеоPart B - The Transposed Conditional (1): Prosecutor's FallacyВидеоPart B - The transposed conditional (2): The Adams and the Dreyfus CasesВидеоWeek 4 Conclusion: Trials by Numbers or Numbers on Trial ?ВидеоAdditional literature Week 4Чтение

Interviews

Interview with Prof. David KayeВидеоInterview with Prof. William ThompsonВидео

Quiz

Week 4Задание
05Week 5: The wonderland of certainty14 материалов

Week 5

Week 5 Introduction: the Wonderland of CertaintyВидеоDetection of fingermarks in the laboratoryВидеоPart A - Identification with Earmarks (1): The Dallagher CaseВидеоPart A - Identification with Earmarks (2): The Dallagher CaseВидеоPart B - Identification with Fingermarks (1): The McKie CaseВидеоPart B - Identification with Fingermarks (2): The McKie CaseВидеоPart C - Identification with Fingermarks: The Mayfield CaseВидеоAnalysis and comparison of the fingermark in Mayfield CaseВидеоWeek 5 Conclusion: The Wonderland of CertaintyВидеоAdditional literature Week 5Чтение

Interviews

Interview with Mr Iain McKieВидеоInterview with Dr Brandon Mayfield and Prof. Sharia MayfieldВидео

Quiz

Week 5Задание

Course conclusions

Course ConclusionsВидео