К содержимому
learnspaceYOUR NEXT CHAPTER
ПРОСТРАНСТВО ОБУЧЕНИЯ
ГлавнаяКаталог курсовМоё обучениеCoursera

Знания без границ

Учитесь у лучших университетов и компаний мира.

Открыть Coursera
Интеграция
Пространство университета
Моё пространствоСтраница курса
↵
ЯЛичный кабинетСтудент
© 2026 LearnSpaceКаждый день — возможность узнать больше.Помощь
Intellectual Humility: Practice · LearnSpace
Назад в каталог
courseraИскусство

Intellectual Humility: Practice

Курс от The University of Edinburgh
Начальный≈ 18.9 чАнглийский
О курсеНавыкиПрограммаПреподаватели

О курсе

We live in a polarised world where all too often people talk past each other. But do you know when to believe what others say? For example, how quick should we be to accept something that someone else tells us is true, and what should we be looking out for when assessing a person's trustworthiness? Meanwhile, what should we do when we encounter disagreements with people who seem to be our equals? How and when should we adjust our beliefs, and how does the appropriate response vary depending on the evidence? These challenges may be especially important in the arena of religious disagreements. How should we weigh the evidence for and against various theistic and atheistic stances? Experts in psychology, philosophy, theology and education are conducting exciting new research on these questions, and the results have important, real-world applications. Faced with difficult questions people often tend to dismiss and marginalize dissent. Political and moral disagreements can be incredibly polarizing, and sometimes even dangerous. And whether it’s Christian fundamentalism, Islamic extremism, or militant atheism, religious dialogue remains tinted by arrogance, dogma, and ignorance. The world needs more people who are sensitive to reasons both for and against their beliefs, and are willing to consider the possibility that their political, religious and moral beliefs might be mistaken. The world needs more intellectual humility. In this course. we will examine the following major questions about applied issues surrounding intellectual humility: • Should you believe what people say? • How should we handle disagreement? • What is the role of evidence in resolving religious disagreements? All lectures are delivered by leading specialists, and the course is organised around a number of interesting readings and practical assignments which will help you address issues related to humility in your daily life. This course can be taken as a part of a series which explores the theory, the science and the applied issues surrounding intellectual humility. Before, we considered how to define and measure intellectual humility, what intellectual virtue is, whether we are born or can become humble, and what cognition and emotions can tell us about intellectual humility. If you are interested, complete all three courses to gain a broader understanding of this fascinating topic. Look for: • Intellectual Humility: Theory - https://www.coursera.org/learn/intellectual-humility-theory • Intellectual Humility: Science - https://www.coursera.org/learn/intellectual-humility-science Check out our trailer to hear more - https://youtu.be/x_CWjrYxKZU. Learners can apply for Financial Aid directly with Coursera to assist with the cost of accessing the full course and gaining a certificate for successfully completing the course.

Навыки, которые вы освоите

Conflict ManagementMediationIntercultural CompetenceEmpathy & Emotional IntelligenceDiversity AwarenessResearchInterpersonal CommunicationsCultural Diversity

Программа курса

5 модулей · 84 учебных материалов

01GETTING STARTED5 материалов

The following materials will introduce you to this course and help you prepare.

Trailer - Intellectual Humility: PracticeВидеоAbout this courseЧтениеCourse assessments and exercisesЧтениеOptional companion bookЧтение

Учитесь у экспертов

Dr. Ian Church

Researcher

Professor Duncan Pritchard

Professor of Philosophy

Dr. Emma Gordon

Postdoctoral Researcher

Intellectual Humility: Practice
В каталоге вашей программы

Инвестируйте в себя

Новые знания — в удобное для вас время.

Начать на Coursera

Обучение откроется на Coursera
в новой вкладке

Обучение на Coursera

≈ 18.9 ч

5 модулей

Язык: Английский

Субтитры: Арабский, Французский, Украинский, Китайский (Китай), Греческий, Итальянский, Бразильский португальский, Нидерландский, Корейский, Немецкий, Пушту, Русский, Тайский, Индонезийский, Шведский, Турецкий, Испанский, Дари, Хинди, Японский, Казахский, Польский

Часть программы вашего университета
Get to know your classmatesОбсуждение
02SHOULD YOU BELIEVE WHAT PEOPLE SAY?26 материалов

Introduction to the module

Before you begin...ЧтениеIan introduces Module 1ВидеоInitial thoughtsЗадание

LEARN: Should you believe what people say? (Professor Peter Graham)

Introduction to testimonyВидеоTrust and scepticismВидеоThe evolutionary background of trustВидеоPractice QuizЗаданиеReconciling testimony with what we already believeВидеоThe right, the wrong, and the humbleВидеоFeels good to be right?ЗаданиеHumility, fear and biasВидеоYour examples of fears and biasesЗаданиеHumility and confidenceВидеоModule quizЗадание

ENGAGE: Readings and Discussions

"Can You Believe What You Hear?" by Ian Church & Peter Samuelson (recommended)ЧтениеReading quiz on "Can You Believe What You Hear?" by Ian Church and Peter SamuelsonЗаданиеJennifer Saul on Implicit Bias (recommended podcast)ЧтениеDaniel Kahneman on Bias (recommended)ЧтениеHow would you evaluate the Humean view of trust?ОбсуждениеCan you think of some good examples of fear leading to confirmation bias?Обсуждение

GO FURTHER

"Social Knowledge and Social Norms" by Peter Graham (further reading)Чтение"Knowledge, Assertion and Humility" by Emma C. Gordon and J. Adam Carter (further reading)ЧтениеMiranda Fricker on Epistemic Injustice (further podcast)Чтение"On Testimony and Transmission" by J. Adam Carter and Philip J. Nickel (further reading)Чтение
03HOW SHOULD WE HANDLE DISAGREEMENT?22 материалов

Introduction to the module

Ian introduces Module 2ВидеоYour initial thoughtsЗадание

LEARN: How should we handle disgareement? (Professor Catherine Elgin)

Introduction to disagreementВидеоPractice QuizЗаданиеBack to last weekЗаданиеDisagreement between equalsВидеоThe disagreements you knowЗаданиеDimensions of reasonable disagreementВидеоThe dimensions in your exampleЗаданиеModule quizЗадание

ENGAGE: Readings and Discussions

"How Should We Handle Disagreement?" by Ian Church & Peter Samuelson (recommended)ЧтениеReading quiz on "How Should We Handle Disagreement?" by Ian Church and Peter SamuelsonЗадание"The Epistemic Significance of Disagreement" by Thomas Kelly (recommended)ЧтениеDid your initial thoughts on why reasonable people can disagree match Professor Elgin's analysis?ОбсуждениеCan you come up with some examples of when we should take the steadfast route in the face of disagreement?ОбсуждениеHow do you approach judging whether the person you're disagreeing with is your epistemic equal?Обсуждение

GO FURTHER

"Reasonable Disagreement" by Catherine Elgin (further reading)Чтение"The Epistemology of Testimony" by Duncan Pritchard (further reading)Чтение"Philosophical Peer Disagreement" by Nicolás Lo Guercio (further reading)Чтение"The Epistemology of Disagreement" (video discussion between Roy Sorensen and David Christensen).Чтение"Intellectual Humility, Knowledge-How and Disagreement" by Duncan Pritchard and J. Adam Carter (further reading)Чтение
04RESOLVING RELIGIOUS DISAGEEMENTS: THE ROLE OF EVIDENCE23 материалов

Introduction to the module

Ian introduces Module 3ВидеоInitial thoughtsЗадание

LEARN

IntroductionВидеоGood disagreementЗаданиеBiases and evidence-weightingВидеоPractice QuizЗаданиеThree evidence-weighting policiesВидеоAssessing privatismВидеоAssessing publicismВидеоAssessing egalitarianismВидеоEvidence weighting in disagreementЗаданиеImproving egalitarianismВидеоModule QuizЗадание

ENGAGE: Readings and Discussions

"What Does Intellectual Humility Tell Us About Religion?" by Ian Church & Peter Samuelson (recommended)ЧтениеReading quiz on "What Does Intellectual Humility Tell Us About Religion?" by Ian Church & Peter SamuelsonЗадание"Faith and Reason" by Duncan Pritchard (recommended reading or viewing)ЧтениеWhat first comes to mind when you hear the phrase “good disagreement”? How would you define it?ОбсуждениеWhy do you think it is so difficult to resolve religious disagreements?ОбсуждениеCan you think of an evidence-weighting policy that you prefer to the type of egalitarianism that Dormandy advances?Обсуждение

GO FURTHER

"Two Concepts of Intellectual Humility" by Jason Baehr (further viewing)Чтение"Can There Be Religious Disagreement Between Epistemic Peers?" by Jennifer Lackey (further viewing)Чтение"Scepticism and Implicit Bias" by Jennifer Saul (further reading)Чтение
05END OF COURSE ASSIGNMENTS8 материалов

ENGAGE

Before you finish...ЧтениеIdentify an unproductive disagreement in the news and diagnose what is going wrong.Взаимная проверка

GO FURTHER: Wikipedia Edit-a-thon!

Show what you learned by editing the Wikipedia entry on intellectual humility!ЧтениеA brief How-ToЧтениеWikipedia Edit-a-thon discussionsОбсуждение

Interested? Would you like to learn more about this topic? Check out the other courses in the Intellectual Humility series!

TRAILER: Intellectual Humility: TheoryЧтениеTRAILER: Intellectual Humility: ScienceЧтение

Survey

Post-Course SurveyЧтение
What do you think would help you be more open to the possibility of being wrong when you encounter disagreement?Обсуждение
Can you think of further aspects of a person’s presentation that increase/decrease the chances of their being believed?Обсуждение
Professor Elgin points out a range of dimensions along which disagreement may occur. Can you think of any others?Обсуждение
Can you think of any other conditions under which an epistemic interlocutor would be epistemically unviable?Обсуждение